IN DEFENSE OF THE NEW FLAMES KIT
This evening, the Flames of Malawi will host Namibia’s Brave Warriors in what promises to be an
enticing encounter. Unfortunately, ahead of the match, instead of discussing
formations, tactics, the starting XI, the Flames playing under floodlights, or
the implications of the result on Malawi’s chances of qualifying for the 2026
World Cup, the dominant topic has been the Flames’ newly unveiled football kits.
![]() |
Sarah Mlimbika, Zainab Kapanda, and CJ Banda modelling the controversial jersey |
Manufactured by Admiral, the kit
set has received heavy criticism from most football fanatics in the country,
particularly due to its perceived poor aesthetics and an uninspired photoshoot
that accompanied the launch. Meanwhile, others have criticized the choice of
Admiral, a brand often associated with ‘cheap’ products among football apparel
enthusiasts.
To express their disappointment,
scores of football fans have taken to social media to voice their displeasure.
Some argue that the kits are bland and uninspiring, while others claim they
lack the sophistication befitting a serious national team. To drive their point
home, some fans have pointed out the apparent resemblance between the green
away kit and Nyasa Big Bullets’ training kit from the 2023 season, which,
coincidentally, was also produced by Admiral. Others have gone as far as
petitioning the Football Association of Malawi (FAM) to recall the kit and
solicit new designs from fans.
![]() |
The Flames from Milan pa boma |
Displeasure with football
kits—whether for a club or a national team—is not a new phenomenon. It happens
globally and has occurred locally before. Domestically, the uproar that
followed the unveiling of the Umbro-issued “AC Milan-esque” black and red
striped Flames jersey in 2014 comes to mind. At the time, Malawians criticized
the jersey for deviating from the traditional colour pattern associated with the
national team. Across the border in Zambia, fans criticized the Kopa kit worn by the Chipolopolo at AFCON 2024 for its poor fabric, which seemed to soak up
sweat. In Europe, fans of PSG, Cardiff City, Bayern Munich, and Stuttgart, among others, have
staged physical protests or pushed for boycotts over jerseys that stray from
traditional colours and patterns. Even across the Atlantic, fans of the USA
launched a petition to force their football federation to change the nationalteam’s kit ahead of the 2022 World Cup.
In my opinion, however, the
uproar over the new Flames jersey is overblown, and FAM should proceed with
bringing the jerseys to market. Here’s why.
![]() |
Mzava, Gaba, Kamwendo, and Ngalande modelling the 2014 Umbro kit |
First, the new set—which includes
a predominantly red home kit, an all-green away kit, and an all-black
alternative kit—has largely maintained the traditional colours and patterns
associated with our national football teams. As such, the new jersey has passed
the core test.
Regarding the argument that the
kits, which all use the same template (a point I personally find problematic
for reasons I will address in a separate article), are ugly due to a lack of
sophistication, one Mr. Matthews Kamaliza eloquently addressed this on Facebook
by pointing out that “Admiral’s design philosophy is rooted in retro-inspiredand classic football aesthetics.” This philosophy differs from the trendy,
futuristic designs currently favoured by brands like Nike, Puma, and Adidas.
Now, do I find the new jerseys
aesthetically pleasing? No, I don’t. However, I don’t believe that warrants
petitions or a recall. It’s normal for football teams to have an unattractive
kit once in a while. What matters most is the respect for traditional colours and
patterns, which the new jersey honours.
![]() |
CJ Banda, Khuda Muyaba, and Pupa Mzava modelling the immediate previous kits |
Second, the kit won’t last
forever. In the modern world, clubs and football federations change jerseys
every season to maximize revenue from shirt sales. However, for the
cash-strapped Football Association of Malawi, releasing a new kit every season
is a far-fetched dream. For example, the Flames wore their previous jersey for
three consecutive years. My point is this: if you strongly dislike the current
jersey, sit this one out like you do when your favourite football club has released a jersey you don't fancy. Eventually, a new jersey will replace it. Just hope
that the next one meets your expectations. Better yet, you could push FAM to
consult fans on the aesthetics of future kits before signing a deal with a new
supplier. Of course, that might be a stretch.
Lastly, the criticism of Admiral
as a “cheap brand” is hard to understand. Given FAM’s financial constraints and
the purchasing power of the average Malawian football fan, engaging high-end
brands like Nike, Adidas, Puma, or Umbro—whose replica shirts typically cost
over $100
![]() |
The Flames rocking Admiral in the 1980s |
For the reasons mentioned above, unless someone can present a compelling rebuttal, I implore FAM to stand their ground and stick with the jersey the Flames are scheduled to debut this evening. Regardless of the number of signatures the ongoing petition generates (impressive work, by the way, to the person who launched it—it’s not easy to generate that many signatures on a Malawian issue), FAM should disregard the criticism and pressure. Bring the kit on the market. I have no doubt it will grow on us, and many who are criticizing it now will eventually learn to love it.
On that note, good luck to the Flames. Burn them Zebras!
Sage argument, I like the design philosophy behind Admiral. With FAM's financial woes, this is a smart move, tikuyenela kuwafila bwana Fleet and team. Let's focus on the core issue (performance) and see if we'll see a proper drilled flames tonight
ReplyDelete